Enkele gedagtes oor die grondslag van deliktuele aanspreeklikheid

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van der Walt, J. C.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-03-31T08:55:46Z
dc.date.available 2009-03-31T08:55:46Z
dc.date.issued 2009-03-31T08:55:46Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10210/2322
dc.description Inaugural lecture--Faculty of Law, Rand Afrikaans University, 22 August 1969 en
dc.description.abstract The development of the basis of the law of delict has centred around the search for a balance between two fundamental human interests, viz. interest in freedom of action and interest in security. Primitive law based liability on causality; hence there was an over-emphasis on the security interest of the individual and group. By a gradual process of development over centuries the emphasis shifted to the interest of freedom. This culminated in the dogmatic axiom of the nineteenth century, viz. no liability without fault. Since the latter part of the last century there has been a progressive erosion of the fault principle by means of legal fictions and reversal of the onus of proof. The technological revolution of the past seven and more decades has clearly demonstrated the inadequacy of the fault principle as the sole basis of delictual liability. The high risk of injury, the increased extent of damage, the difficulty of proving fault, and the economic success of the industrial revolution have led to the emergence of a new principle, viz. risk or strict liability. In view of the emergence of two apparently conflicting and independent principles of delictual liability, viz. fault and risk, the most fundamental dogmatic problem of the law of delict is the question as to the common basis of delictual liability. It is suggested that the common basis is creation of an extraordinary risk of injury. In the case of fault liability the risk is created by the unreasonable (negligent) conduct of the actor; in the case of strict liability, by the inherently dangerous nature of the reasonable (non-negligent) conduct. Delictual liability, therefore, attaches where damage has been wrongfully caused by the creation of a substantial risk, either through fault (fault liability) or by the inherently hazardous nature of the activity which has a priori been designated as such (risk or strict liability). en
dc.language.iso afr en
dc.rights University of Johannesburg en
dc.subject Delictual liability en
dc.subject Law of delict en
dc.title Enkele gedagtes oor die grondslag van deliktuele aanspreeklikheid en
dc.title.alternative Thoughts on the basis of delictual liability en
dc.type Inaugural en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UJDigispace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account